Timitsego V2 Timmeh Ze Nub Uf Epacnass
Posts : 640 Join date : 2009-05-20 Age : 29 Location : Belgium
| Subject: Re: AC items discussion Sat Jun 20, 2009 11:10 am | |
| - TDawg wrote:
- IM pretty sure BoA will become A SPECIAL guardian-only item, and to make up for that, DF will probably have a non-Mem Adult Dragon, and MQ will prolly have the energy scythe thingy
NEW DISCUSSION: Gravity Overlord
1 word: HOW FCKIN STONED WHERE YOU WHEN YOU FCKIN DESIGNED THIS SHIT Everything...good...in...this...release...was...ac =/Need..to..kill..ae | |
|
Death the Kid Seppy's Elite Shadow Doom General of Doom
Posts : 314 Join date : 2009-05-20 Location : MAH HOUSE
| Subject: Re: AC items discussion Sat Jun 20, 2009 12:41 pm | |
| - Timitsego V2 wrote:
- TDawg wrote:
- IM pretty sure BoA will become A SPECIAL guardian-only item, and to make up for that, DF will probably have a non-Mem Adult Dragon, and MQ will prolly have the energy scythe thingy
NEW DISCUSSION: Gravity Overlord
1 word: HOW FCKIN STONED WHERE YOU WHEN YOU FCKIN DESIGNED THIS SHIT Everything...good...in...this...release...was...ac =/ Need..to..kill..ae don't we all tim. don't we all. and teedee, that armor was terrible looking you could clearly see it was all based on swordhaven adept. | |
|
Timitsego V2 Timmeh Ze Nub Uf Epacnass
Posts : 640 Join date : 2009-05-20 Age : 29 Location : Belgium
| Subject: Re: AC items discussion Sat Jun 20, 2009 12:59 pm | |
| - Death the Kid wrote:
- Timitsego V2 wrote:
- TDawg wrote:
- IM pretty sure BoA will become A SPECIAL guardian-only item, and to make up for that, DF will probably have a non-Mem Adult Dragon, and MQ will prolly have the energy scythe thingy
NEW DISCUSSION: Gravity Overlord
1 word: HOW FCKIN STONED WHERE YOU WHEN YOU FCKIN DESIGNED THIS SHIT Everything...good...in...this...release...was...ac =/ Need..to..kill..ae don't we all tim. don't we all.
and teedee, that armor was terrible looking you could clearly see it was all based on swordhaven adept. What? Iit is? i didnt notice <.< | |
|
Sponsored content
| Subject: Re: AC items discussion | |
| |
|